Mis-Shapen Legacy: The Black Man’s Contribution to Single Parenthood


America: a nation grounded in mathematics, rooted in division.  On one side, healthy, well-adjusted children, safe homes, combined incomes and a sound promise of stability and access to education.  On the other side, abandonment, father-absent homes, stunted growth nurtured by instability, and an increased likelihood of poverty and educational failure.

Once the thread binding the American social fabric, the institution of marriage and the sanctity thereof has fast become a myth in the black community. 

I recently spoke with an acquaintance who has a number of children by different women, all of whom reside with their mothers. He told me that he was proud of having so many children (6).  Stating that he didn’t care how many mothers there were, his children are his legacy; the only thing he’ll leave behind when he dies.

It has statistically been proven thousands of times over that the absence of a dual-parent structure (single parent homes) leads consistently to higher dropout rates, an increased likelihood of teen pregnancy, drug use and emotional instability, along with an increased rate of the likelihood of incarceration.

I have a cousin recently married to the father of her 11 year old son, her boyfriend of nearly 15 years.  I also have a friend recently married to her boyfriend of 7 years and the father of her two young daughters.  Though both women loved and bore the children of these men, they had to wait for a great majority of their child’s adolescence, to be married.  The first couple have not been in a stable, uninterrupted relationship the entire 15 years.  The two had at one point chosen to cohabitate, which didn’t work out and led to a temporary separation.  Her son remained with her during the separation.  The second couple, however, never lived together prior to being married and have enjoyed an uninterrupted 7 years together.

I site these two examples, one as the exception and one as the rule.  Is cohabitation wrong?  Not necessarily, dependent upon your plans for the future.  Is cohabitation wrong for people desiring to marry the individual with whom they cohabitate?  Maybe.  It is important to recognize that cohabitation does not increase the likelihood of marriage.  For some couples with no marital future outlook, cohabitation is perfect because people who don’t value marriage and have no regard for long-term commitment are likely to cohabitate.  It gives them the option of living together, no promises, no guarantees until they grow bored.  They share living expenses and get to spend more time together. 

For these people, cohabitation is the end of the road.  For others, cohabitation is a building block, the last step on the road to marital bliss.  Unfortunately, though some of the second group does eventually marry, this outcome is not guaranteed and if they do get married the likelihood of divorce is greatly increased.  Though marriages resulting from cohabitation last a varying duration, often short of forever, relationships that stop at cohabitation generally end in just over a year.[1]  Living together may seem a better alternative than casual dating, but it can also change ones view of marriage, especially if the relationship doesn’t work out.  Marriage will begin to look like an unattainable joke and people may start to think of intimate relationships as a temporary and fragile waste of time.

While men are out impregnating women they know they don’t want to marry, in efforts to build or extend a mis-shapen and highly misguided ‘legacy’, they are thinking of no one’s best interest, not even their own.  Marriage is much better for our health and happiness than being single, especially for men.  Having a wife means having a woman who cares for your entire family, not just your children in your absence.  It means having someone who will make sure that you see a doctor so that early warning signs of illness don’t go undetected.  A great portion of her job is to ensure that you live a long and healthy life.

Married people are much happier than the single; they have fewer expenses, shared incomes, a sound support base, and live longer.[2] The rationale is simple, married men not only have a wife to tell them what’s healthy for them, but most wives provide nearly 90% of their husbands prepared meals.  Fewer married men than single smoke and even if they drink, married men are less likely to hang out in bars, so they drink far less than single men.

When a man loses his wife or a woman worthy of the title, they begin to smoke and drink more heavily or develop habits that weren’t previously a part of their routines.  They eat more fast food and begin or increase activities that lead to diabetes, high blood pressure, cirrhosis & other liver conditions, and the worst, the unwavering, unforgiveable cancer.[3]  Single men are even more likely to commit suicide than married men.[4] 

The average black man’s age at death is 69.8, 6 years short of their white counterparts and 7 years short of black women, this due in part to the fact that white men are likely to have fewer “baby mommas”, yet are more likely to marry a woman with whom they have children.  More than 2/3 of white men and less than 1/3 of black men marry the mother of their child (ren).[5]  Not that white men don’t abandon their families, black men are simply more in favor of the pleasures of quick sex, brief cohabitation and unwed parenthood.  Black men are also unlikely to seek medical attention unless their illness is persistent or debilitating, sadly increasing the likelihood of death and the spread of potentially deadly disease.  Immediate temptation and instant gratification override sound judgment.  Sex with different women daily, weekly, or monthly becomes far more appealing than sex with the same woman for the rest of your life, especially if that woman comes with the responsibility of raising your children.

Black men have come to value a roll in the hay over responsibilities of family and the joy of midnight meals over candlelight with your wife, your sons’ first touchdown or your daughters’ dance recital; it seems a lot more convenient to hear about or read a photocopy of your child’s report card after having sex with a stranger.

It is time to stop making excuses, blaming slavery and seeking psychological foundations.  In the days of slavery men were taken from their families by force, they didn’t lay with whomever they pleased and disappear at the sound of the word baby.  They rejoiced at the prospect of new life, love, and family.  Today, men choose to leave the families they claim to have fought and prayed for.

A man’s greatest and most important role is as a father and protector.  Fathers are a family’s only defense against a world where hyper-energetic individuals roam the streets unsupervised.  They belong at home with their families, protecting them from harm, not in the street with the same people their families need protection from. 

By impregnating women and refusing to marry them, black men are adding to the risk of children just like their own.  We shouldn’t have to keep shining light on the obvious to improve their sight, they see what’s going on in our community just as clearly as black women, they simply choose to ignore it because our society too easily let’s them off the hook.  Example:

Boy meets girl, boy and girl ‘fall in love’, move in together and boy proposes, professing his undying love and desire to spend forever and build a family with girl.  While making arrangements for their wedding, girl finds out that she’s pregnant, tells boy who responds as no longer ready for marriage, then disappears.  When boy resurfaces, he now smokes and drinks heavily, has gained weight from frequent alcohol and fast food ingestion (things he never did or approved of during their relationship) and has lost his drive for legitimate success, the attribute that once brought the two together.  There is no plausible explanation for such behavior and no possible way that this man could fail to see that family life with his child and the woman he claimed to have loved is the best and only valid option.

A conference held at Atlanta’s Morehouse College in 1998 called, Turning the Corner on Father Absence in Black America, showed that the majority of black children born out of wedlock will spend just over 11 years of their childhood with only one parent.[6] 

As single parent homes become more and more common, it’s the mothers who raise the children with little to no help from the fathers.  The men get unconditional love, great sex, beautiful children and the opportunity to move on from that family without thought of their responsibility in their child’s daily care or well-being.  Yes, shared custody and weekend fathers are better than no father at all, but at some point, you have to grow up and realize that there’s more to a child’s life than a few hours or days per month.  Children need love, attention and care from both parents every day. 

Young people living in a father-absent home are twice as likely to be incarcerated as children in two-parent households[7] and absent fathers also cause problems for children outside of their families.  Young boys who have absent fathers will begin to think ill of their potential prospects for the future once they step outside to see countless unmarried men either unemployed, stealing, or involved in illegal activities.  That’s why they’re more likely to drop out of school and be incarcerated.  Seeing the fast money and “free” lifestyle, not having to get up every morning and go to school or work but still being able to afford anything you want, they begin to lose interest in their futures and favor the quick buck.  They see no point in going to school, and working hard to get a good job just to be able to afford what drug dealers and thieves already have.

Black men in America are more interested in promoting a false legacy than solidifying their manhood.  They don’t think about the fact that creating a child makes them a father because our culture has changed so drastically that men are now offered sexual access without the required exchange of personal commitment, and the greater majority of black men are taking the sex, looking at their repeated procreation as proof of their virility and masculinity. 

Giving life to a child doesn’t make you a man; it makes you a baby daddy, choosing to be a father, makes you a man.

Black men refuse to see the picture they themselves have painted.  They have tainted the black woman’s societal image and appeal.  If a woman, or girl allows herself to be seduced by the lies and charm of a man claiming to love her, her value is reduced by other men based on the prospect of having to raise another man’s child.  If you love these women, why do you leave and when you do, where does the love go?  Definitely not to the children you abandoned and hardly ever see after you leave.  There was once a time when, if a man deserted a pregnant woman he was deemed dishonorable and banished from his home and community.[8]  If this woman was good enough to bear your child, and be tied to you through that child for the next 18 years or more, why wasn’t she worth spending the rest of your life with?  A life that may not last as long without her. 

It is time to stop devaluing black women by intentionally impregnating people you know you don’t want to marry, because when you do that you teach your sons to do the same and your daughters to expect the same.  Many black women get pregnant and would like to marry their child’s father, but although black men and women both want children, not many black men see the sense in getting married, and if they do, are far more likely to cheat than their wives.[9]

It’s time for black males to start looking at what they’re doing to our children.  A child’s future is largely set in place during their earliest years.  That’s why we refer to them as young and impressionable minds.  If you wish to make an impact in a child’s life, it is vital that you start early and work hard.  Do you really want your child’s lasting impression of you to be one of a deadbeat who only cares about himself?  Children learn how to behave in relationships from watching the interactions of the adults surrounding them.  If a man beats his wife or girlfriend, he shouldn’t be stunned to see his sons beating their girlfriends or his daughters in abusive relationships.  They are simply manifesting what you have taught them to do! 

Parents are the painters of a child’s blank canvass, teach them to be who they need to be by being the example they need to see.  If we love our children as much as we claim to, why aren’t they worth the stability of family?



Follow Me as I Follow God
@RevealingRuth










[1]  Larry L. Bumpass and James A. Sweet.  “National Estimates f Cohabitation,” Demography 26 (1989): 620-21
[2] Linda Waite and Maggie Gallagher.  The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially (2001); 47-64
[3] Catherine Ross, John Mirowsky, and Karen Goldstein.  “The Impact of the Family on Health: A Decade in Review,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 52 (1990):  1059-78
[4] Nadine Marks and James Lambert, “Marital Status Continuity and Change Among Young and Midlife Adults: Longitudinal Effects on Psychological Well-Being,” Journal of Family Issues 19 (1998):  652-86
[5] Scott J. South, “For Love or Money?  Socio-demographic Determinants of the Expected benefits from Marriage,” in The Changing American Family, ed. Scott J. South and Stewart Tolnay (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1992), 58.
[6] Turning the Corner on Father Absence in Black America, a report from the Morehouse Conference on African American Fathers (1999).  The statement was signed by fifty eminent scholars and activists, both black and white.
[7] Cynthia C. Harper and Sara McLanahan, “Father Absence and Youth Incarceration,” paper presented to the American Sociological Association (August 1998).
[8] Lawrence Stone, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500-1800, abridged ed. (New York: Harper & Row 1979), 398
[9] Scott J. South, “For Love or Money?  Socio-demographic Determinants of the Expected benefits from Marriage,” in The Changing American Family, ed. Scott J. South and Stewart Tolnay (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1992), 130, 135-36.

No comments:

Post a Comment